this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
492 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

17177 readers
130 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Technically it’s for any printer capable of printing a firearm or the components of a firearm, which is…. every printer. What a bafflingly stupid proposal. If you’re in NY, please call your reps and tell them to oppose this bill.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 187 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Luigi would have passed a background check.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And didn't even use his own printer (according to his confession/manifesto)..

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

was it even printed in new york? I mean im sure someone would never bring one in from jersey.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Everything is legal in New Jersey.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Why do you print like you're running out of time?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 130 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)
  1. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTER" MEANS A COMPUTER OR COMPUTER-DRIVEN MACHINE OR DEVICE CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT FROM A DIGITAL MODEL

Well, that's a broad definition. I guess to whomever wrote that, a CNC mill is also a 3d printer.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 2 months ago (6 children)

It's not like inkjets produce 2 dimensional ink. I'd love to see someone argue in court that it's technically impossible to create a non 3d printer

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A CNC mill seems much more capable of manufacturing firearms than some 300 buck printer.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Not really.

There are gun parts that just can't be printed in plastic (reliably. There are proof of concept "all plastic except the firing pin" guns). But... because of how lobbyists tainted what few gun control laws we have, most of what makes a gun a gun CAN be printed and the rest can be bought as after market parts. That is why an incredibly common "ghost gun" is basically "print this and then go buy this replacement barrel and this baggy of parts to repair a glock".

Whereas a mill is great for those metal parts and you can theoretically mill an entire gun, it isn't going to be a gun you "want" to use and, odds are, you are going to need a lot more technical skills. And for stuff like "ghost guns" and the bootleg mods used in stuff like The Troubles? A 3d printer is MUCH more accessible and MUCH easier to make.

The reality is that neither is going to be effective in the case of a militia/uprising scenario (yes, you can print an AR-15 and it isn't THAT hard to reinforce the plastic to handle intermediate rounds. No, you can't print a hellfire missile or a predator drone or a tank). And for the purposes of a school shooting? Why print a gun when you can just grab daddy's glock out of his nightstand or junk drawer?


I'll also add on the reason why additive manufacturing is so loved by Industry. Milling is subtractive. You get a piece of stock and you cut it until it is the part you want. If you can guarantee said piece of stock is approximately the same dimensions every time, you can automate that. But getting a piece to those dimensions has a significant cost. 3d printing? As long as you clear out the build plate and sort of control the environment, it is the same operations every single time.

So to 3d print a glock? You go to one of the naughty sites, get the STL, make a few tweaks to your slicer, and start it (old Vice actually did a really good video on this). After that you wait until it is done, remove the supports, file the ever loving hell out of it, and you are ready to go blasting.

To mill a glock? You go to one of the naught sites and get the gcode. You then adjust that gcode to fit the dimensions of your piece of stock (or put in the time to make your piece of stock the dimensions the gcode is expecting...). You then do one process, stop it, move and remount the part precisely to expose the correct surfaces, and do the next process. And so forth.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

"Not really"

Yes, really. If you print something out of plastic and have to go out and buy a barrel and other hardware to put in it, you might as well just mold it out of paper mache.

A CNC can make a gun from start to finish that you wouldn't be worried about blowing your fingers off when you pulled the trigger, without adding outside hardware to.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

You clearly didn't read anything I said after that first line but this is just too fun:

A CNC can make a gun from start to finish that you wouldn’t be worried about blowing your fingers off when you pulled the trigger, without adding outside hardware to.

Mostly tells me you have no idea what is inside of a firearm outside of "magic".

Over simplifying, but modern firearms generally consist of

  1. A frame: This is usually a mix of plastic and metal for comfort, weight, and heat dissipation reasons. But there is nothing saying you can't have an all metal frame. Some parts will receive load, some parts are purely cosmetic/ergonomic. This is demonstrably not a problem for either 3d printer or mill.
  2. Lots of pins and levers: These are the mechanisms that actually make the gun go bang when you pull the trigger. And, depending on how spicy you want to get, continue to go bang while you hold down the trigger. Again, some parts are stressed, some aren't. There are ways to do all plastic that should last at least a few hundred rounds. The issue is more one of tolerances. Getting a 3d printer to be able to print with that level of precision is more work than people want to put in. Similarly, getting a mill capable of that level of precision is also a mother (Adam Savage of Will Smith's Tested fame has a lot of videos where he is basically tackling this challenge for different projects). But also? These are the parts that "wear out" and are completely uncontrolled and can be bought online trivially. So why manufacture this yourself in the first place?
  3. Springs. Good fricking luck milling your own springs with the required properties. Also good fricking luck printing your own springs. That said, I actually watched a REALLY cool video where someone proof of concept made a gun out of 3d printable leaf springs and while the guy doing it was a complete and utter dipshit, it was a work of engineering beauty that you couldn't pay me enough to hold in my hand... But, again, these are trivially easy to buy online so why bother?
  4. The last major part in this oversimplified breakdown is the barrel (and how you seal it but I am just going to include that here). These are the parts that experience the most forces and heat when the gun is fired since that is the part where the bang happens. Everything else you can probably get away with some cheap mild steel. That? You need some good stuff otherwise you are going to learn just how weak that cheap stock was. You CAN mill chrome moly and the like but that is a much bigger challenge than cutting through cheap steel like it is butter and amplifies all of the above tolerance issues. I will outright say that you can't print this in plastic even though I have seen in person demonstrations of proof of concepts of that.

And the cheap steel problem? Go look up pictures of the "custom" guns used in conflicts like The Troubles. A lot have cracked or split barrels and the like because of that exact issue.

Which, like I said in the comment you refused to read, is why you just buy the hard parts online or in cash at your local gun store (... might need to go to a specialty shop instead of a Walmart). Because they are not controlled since they generally need to get replaced eventually anyway.

At which point? Mills and Printers both work great. It is just that the former needs a lot more machinist skill to be done. Whereas the latter is just downloading an STL.


Just because this topic really intrigues the engineer in me:

Even if you are REALLY anti-gun (moreso in the sense of absolutely zero meaningful gun control laws that don't predominantly target minorities and lower income folk) but can still appreciate an engineering problem:

Vice, back before it was a shithole content farm that talks about how right wing chuds are sticking it to the man, had a REALLY good video where a reporter went to a gathering of 3d printed firearms enthusiasts and even printed their own gun with the help of one of them. There are a lot of uncomfortable parts that kind of felt like fallon tussling the dipshit's hair back in the day, but it is also one of the very few (easily reached on youtube) videos that show what 3d printing a gun actually is.

inRange TV has a video that doesn't get too into the making of a 3d printed gun but does show some of the recent advances (and I believe one of the models shown is quite similar to a certain mario brother's favorite toy...) which is useful from the perspective of how 3d printed parts are coupled to off the shelf parts and so forth.

And while the owner of the channel is a real dipshit and it is explicitly NOT about 3d printed guns (because that would hurt his monetization), Forgotten Weapons did a sponsored video where he turned a common handgun into basically a PDW using a kit. And, in the process of doing that, it really highlights what part of a firearm is the legal and controlled part and what parts can be easily replaced... or purchased in a discount bin. And Forgotten Weapons, in general, is really good at actually disassembling/field stripping firearms to show the inner workings and the engineering. And it is a fun thought process to think through what processes were used to make those parts and what processes could be used to make those parts instead.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 months ago (10 children)

You can also technically make a gun with generic plumbing supplies or you could finagle one with random garbage and a drill bit.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Home Depot background checks are next.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

THIS IS AMERICA! You can't post stuff like this outside of a classroom!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I am sorry (not), but I am speaking to you from Germany via an Austrian server. So:

Muh freduum of speek!

Did I do this correctly?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

You forgot the screaming eagles and the guitar solo. Otherwise, a solid attempt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Anything to avoid having to actually address the systemic poverty and bigotry ingrained in the system that leads to violence...

From what I understand the "problem" as it's being framed in terms of ghost guns and inner city crime or whatever the buzzword is this year is not hobbyists running off a lower or frame for themselves. None of those guys in the hood and their switches are buying Bambus or building Vorons and suddenly turning into 3D printing gurus -- Someone, or several someones more likely, are deliberately mass manufacturing these things for sale to the criminals which is already thoroughly illegal. Find the gun runners and stomp on them. I thought you guys were supposed to have this big scary police force and surveillance apparatus?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Awful. Literally banning science, because it can be misused.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

We'd better go the full mile. Here's my list of things to be banned, For Our Safety^TM^:

  • 3/4" and 1" galvanized steel pipe and endcaps
  • Cases of matches
  • Acetone
  • Stump killer
  • Milling machines
  • Lathes
  • Drill presses
  • Hydrogen peroxide
  • Salt, Sodium Chloride
  • Stainless steel bolts
  • Benchtop power supplies
  • Sulfur
  • Carbon
  • Water
  • Aluminum foil

I'm sure I can think of others if you give me a minute or two.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (5 children)

new york will do anything but fix actual problems lmao

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Gonna require background checks to get plumbing supplies or to go to the hardware store? Cause I can make a gun a hell of a lot easier and quicker with that shit, than I can with a 3d fuckin printer.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

Luigi had no background to check.

This is pure flail.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

How stupid, I use my printer to print minis for DnD. But, wait, it could theoretically print a gun, better get a background check, and have a waiting period of 6 months... fucking stupid.

Let's try to address the problems that led to this. Nah, let's try to ban stuff instead.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It won't even be effective. As I pointed out earlier, hoodlums in the ghetto, who are the implicit targets of this, aren't buying Bambus and becoming 3D printing experts overnight just to run off one off-the-books Glock. Someone with five or six brain cells to rub together is printing guns in quantity and selling them to the criminals. Anyone willing to employ that business model can and will simply kit build a printer rather than buying an off the shelf unit, which is certainly not difficult to do. It just adds one extra step to the operation for anyone who truly wants to do this, and 3D printing a working firearm is already a pretty decent commitment especially if you're not already an experienced printer. Especially Glock frames.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Are they going to require background checks for purchasing metal working equipment? Or maybe just make it illegal to bring any metal to melting point without a license.

Because you can make guns with metal.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is absolutely the best action we could take to address the gun violence problem.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tighten background checks for guns: ✋ Tighten background checks for 3d printers: 👀

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"People are 3d printing guns, should we require background checks on the required barrels/trigger mechanisms/ammo/magazines/rails etc?

No! We should require checks on the universal machine that can among a billion other things manufacture the plastic parts!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is braindead, are they gonna require background checks for the hardware store next?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Some actual gun control laws would be better, not to mention universal health care. What’s next on the list? Kitchen knives? Pans, pots? ;)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

Tell us your corporate paymasters are afraid without saying they're afraid.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someone go ahead and trademark the term "ghost printer."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about a bunch of stepper motor and some plastic. Do I need a background check for that?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Well, everyone knows only main boards have a serial number, so you need a permit for that. But the rest is a spare part, you can get it freely.

/s

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Any engineer worth their salt can do this without a 3d printer. Idiots.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Next up, you’re going to have to register your drill press, lathe, etc.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

~~Keep in mind that this is a state that bans nunchuks.~~

Never mind, NY banned nunchuks in 1974 but then in 2018 a federal court decided that New Yorkers have a 2nd amendment right to nunchuks.

Maybe there's a constitutional right to keep and bear 3D printers too? If your life is in danger, you can use the concealed printer you're carrying to make a gun and then defend yourself with that gun.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, my state considers throwing stars to be "assault weapons" now and their sale and possession is banned. There's still stupidity abound if you care to look hard enough.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

their sale and possession is banned

How will I assassinate the Shogun now?!

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Oh boy can’t wait for them to ban two pipes that fit inside each other and a nail.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How much harder would it be than getting an actual gun?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Road trip to Georgia and back, basically.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Shoot one CEO in NYC and the entire state goes nuts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Again. This bill was introduced last year, by the same person, and it died at the time because of some grassroots actions. Now, the wording is slightly different (so it can be introduced again as a "different" bill), and it's being tried again.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Oh my god it's back? I was hoping we'd seen the last of it back in 2023.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Politicians are such profoundly unserious people.

load more comments
view more: next ›