this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
246 points (100.0% liked)

Space

10065 readers
66 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 114 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where do I donate to help the asteroid?

[–] regrub@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is there any way we can speed it up?

[–] catharso@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Let's point all our magnets towards the sky!

🧲🌠

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably a carbonic asteroid rather than ferrous

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No worries! We’re working on that, too!
Melting the ice caps shifts mass, and therefore, gravity, away from the largely unpopulated poles and nearer to where the people live.

But this problem will not solve itself with any one solution. We must also petition our government to act now to stage a mission to nudge the asteroid into earth’s orbit! With modern science, we can do this.
I believe in humanity’s power to defeat humanity!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

A large enough impulse could knock it onto an impact trajectory in 2028. "Large enough" would be absolutely gigantic though, and we have to catch up with it, making it quite impractical. It would be cheaper to just build some more multi-megaton nukes for the same effect.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Having seen Scott Manley's video on the topic, it seems well within the realm of possible.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

That's for changing the trajectory of the 2032 encounter by a few thousand km, not changing the 2028 encounter by 8 million km. And if we're changing the 2032 encounter we can smack it as it goes by in 2028 instead of playing catch-up before then.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 44 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This has been a good test of our planetary defense procedures, and will be an even better test on the off chance the probability resolves to 100%. I'm rooting for an impact trajectory, since we'd either get to see humanity's first real asteroid deflection or witness the largest asteroid impact in over a century. (Hopefully in the ocean or a sparsely populated area!)

[–] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And hopefully it can be highly rich in rare minerals, so that when the ashes of WW3 finally settle down, at least the future generations of humans or not-human sapient entities will at least get something good out of the whole ridiculous mess we're currently in lol

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, at the speed they travel, an asteroid will be vaporised in the impact. Whatever rare earths there are will be scatter as a fine powder over a large area.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, I half expect that if we get a 100% chance, governments are going to see where it's going to land (sea/Africa) and decide it's not worth the spend/let's see what happens if we let it hit.

Really hope I'm wrong, but I don't have a lot of faith in humanity anymore.

[–] SamboT@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Why would we mitigate the asteroid if its cheaper to clean up after a non-consequential impact?

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To test our ability to stop it. If one was going to hit a major city, that's not the best situation to be trying something out for the first time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] knightly@pawb.social 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's only a city-killer, but last I saw there were a few cities in the estimated impact area. Fortunately we'll get a better idea of whether it's going to hit in 2028. Plenty of time to launch a redirection mission or evacuate the danger zone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] isles@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't subscribe to your death cult.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

3.1% odds are nothing to sneeze at. Ever played D&D?

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

XCom vets know what's about to happen

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It'll climb to 95% and then phase through the earth to somehow miss entirely?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mousefad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

roll for save vs. asteroid on a D30...

Balls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nutteman@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Don't threaten me with a good time

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Good.

Up those numbers.

We're awful.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

A direct hit would be about the size of a fission nuclear bomb. Devastating for a city, but no regional or country-wide impacts, let alone globally

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not even a little global cooling?

As a treat?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If anything, it might get a tiny bit warmer

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

From the article

In a new update, the space agency has increased the chances of asteroid 2024 YR4 colliding with Earth, with the probability of impact rising to 3.1 per cent or one-in-32 odds of impact β€” the highest probability of a collision yet.

IE - 3%.

3% events happen all of the time!

The article stresses that this probability has been going up over the past year or so, which is likely neither here nor there, but I can totally understand how it’s alarming in a post-COVID world.

Slightly more likely than rolling two sixes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago

first hit moscow and take an insane bounce and hit washington DC please. that's all I'm asking.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It will be in 2032, so near the end of Trump's third term.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Bruh the DC metro area is statistically one of the most anti Trump places in the US. Let's root for it to hit Maralago instead.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Don’t look up

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

is this the aliens going "welp they elected Trump again time to press the reset button"

[–] subarctictundra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is the expected path the probability is going to take. Scott Manley made a great video on that.

Basically the area in which the asteroid is going to be includes the earth. When you shrink this area earth is going to take up more space, unless it left the cone. I.e. measurements increase the likelihood until they don't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sickday@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would asking for it to both hit the Earth and for me to be right below the impact zone be asking too much?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Unless you are a terrible person, yes.

If it falls on a joint meeting of Trump and Putin who once again decided to have a meeting to discuss Ukraine without Ukraine that should be fantastic, and not at all asking too much. Hopeful musk is hanging out with bezos and Netanyahu and Xi are talking too. Really not asking enough if you think about it

[–] Sepix@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As if fascists and climate change wheren't enough. Here, have an asteroid!

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

What if it lands an the fascists and dust in the atmosphere cancels climate change for a couple of decades. Could that work?

[–] vane@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How many people need to die before someone hits the Earth with a rock ?

load more comments