this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
985 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

15311 readers
2793 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 97 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It says pick all squares that contain street light so it counts because it contains part of a street light. I get these wrong like 50 percent of the time so IDK.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But you know who doesn't get these wrong? Bots!

(Source: experimented with Skyvern)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, because these aren't to stop bots. They're to train bots.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I used to do this but have learned (like a fucking machine) that its best not to as that gives me a better success rate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Good thing self-driving cars were trained on your data!

(Flashback to that Will Smith movie…)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Or... you got it right but they take the chance and ask again to grab info about how you solve some more.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I suck at these, apparently. I especially hate the motorcycles, but this goes for almost anything. Do I select the tile with just some wheel in it? Is the wheel a motorcycle too? What about the rider, are they the motorcycle? I mean, when a bike passes you on the road, you don't say "I got passed by a motorcycle and its rider". What about the pole the traffic light is on, does that count as part of the traffic light? I end up doing them for like ten minutes until my wife comes over and gets it first try.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

do motorbikes and mopeds count as motorcycles?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

They do but shouldn't. I had a captcha scooter recently.

Note: They didn't ask me to find the "scooter" squares.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

Highly recommend Buster extension. You click on it and it uses the audio version and solves it for you. Works like 95% of the time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

That was interesting, and l liked the one it links to at the end, Staying Alive, even better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If I protect the body it’s “why does the soul need a body” and if I don’t protect the body it’s “how does reconstructing the body make sure the soul comes with it” it’s a catch-22 is what it is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did it say anything about needing a soul to survive?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It doesn't define what a body without a soul is at all. If we are to presume a soul exists, as the question instructs us to, then we need the variable information of what those without souls who are unfrozen become. It feels like they're forcing assumptions where no justification for said assumptions are made.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's just meant to be a thought exercise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's weird, I followed the instructions too closely opposed to basing it on emotional response. Not sure whether i would answer differently responding emotionally. I'm only in 7% agreement with the sample population lol!

I find the statistics mildly disturbing on the last query.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah the last question was the only one I deviated from the majority on.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I have noticed that the chances of success increase if one "forgets" the ever so slightly in squares or things like bicycle handlebars.

I get the impression that perfectionists have to purposefully make mistakes to count as humans in these things.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

I now take a rapid fire who cares if it’s wrong approach to these. If I bother at all…

[–] And009 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yep, my OCD kicked nuts hate it

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Overthinking is a sign of not being a bot

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

sleep(10);

print("You might be right.")

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Depending on the language, that might only sleep for 10 milliseconds, outing you as bot for sure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Got me the first time I was writing a bash script, sleep(1000)... Why is this not working???

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's based on whatever the majority of humans using captcha say. They ask multiple question on the captcha. Some are testing you on. Some they don't know and give to multiple people to figure out which boxes should be selected

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ok. So is there enough streetlight in the square?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Should be yes, but the human is only interested in getting passed the prompt, not with accuracy so it's no. Which I'm pretty sure fucks with their AI training, but who cares.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

If the majority of those given that specifc question say so, then yes

If the majority given it say no, then no

There's no predefined answer here

One of creators of the captchas said in an interview that they themselves were never sure about the edges and if they should include it or not

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Gaaah! Wait! What's the answer?? Sometimes I click that square, but other random times I don't.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

The answer is the time and decision making, not correct choices.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

There are 5 lights.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're determining the answer by training Google's AI

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If we're supposed to be telling the AI what's right, why do we so often get it "wrong?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My theory is they have determined you to be a good human, so they want you to do more work for them. The more you "fail" the more work they get out of you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've found that if its only the tiniest bit then not to click. U also gotta account for the object hitboxes being rectangular. I have been trained by a machine in how to convince the machine I am human by lieing to it thus training the machine more wrong. A perfect case of misalignment lol.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It really does not matter is what I learned, I just click whatever I see in 1 second and that is it. I will have to redo some, but I always had to do that. So I stopped wasting any time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I fail these fucking things every time. What is the correct answer supposed to be? I assume people are supposed to get it wrong in some specific way?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A lot of times it 'fails' you on purpose to get more training data. If you pass the first check then it knows you're human, but gives you a second check with data its less sure about, to gather human responses. Thats why the second one usually has a bunch of pictures that then fade out to more pictures once you select them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It shouldn't be my responsibility to train their stupid software. Fuck the Internet. I miss 2007 Internet with Geocities, angelfire, xanga, Live journal and Myspace. Back in the day I had like 10 favorite sites I would visit daily. Now, the whole freaking Internet is delivered through maybe 4 apps owned by billionaires that actively want to harm us for selfish gain. I'm sure it was bad back then too, but at least we didn't funnel the entire Internet through a handful of private companies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

smartphone apps suck (except some, like lemmy)
basically if it’s not on github, i’m not installing it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sometimes mine is like 15 attempts and then it says congrats you're a robot

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Only the ones that are mostly filled. The ones where it pokes just a little bit, you can select or you could skip, it shouldn't really matter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I always thought street lights ≠ traffic lights?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, that's just the comic author

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Audio captcha -> open-source* speech-to-text -> cursor inserts the captcha for me, w/o an extra dedicated CAPTCHA add on some of the corresponding potential hassles

(Closed-source superwhisper + Keyboard Maestro also make this a breeze on Mac :) )

* ggerganov/ whisper.cpp - Port of OpenAI's Whisper model in C/C++

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Just try to do the worst posible just to pass it but at the same time fuck up the AI mind

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I've had to do 30 captchas in a row on Microsoft services, talk about testing patience lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

These are made so the lowest denominator can pass. Both options usually work.

load more comments
view more: next ›