this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
442 points (100.0% liked)

News

30736 readers
3307 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today the U.S. House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act, giving the powerful a dangerous new route to manipulate platforms into removing lawful speech that they simply don't like. President Trump himself has said that he would use the law to censor his critics. The bill passed the Senate in February, and it now heads to the president's desk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 115 points 2 months ago (4 children)

OK so this is meant for revenge porn / stolen photos... but it's written so broadly that it will affect basically any online speech. Great.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it passed. it fucking passed. i don't think people realize what they're about to use this for (or at least they don't fully realize the implications).

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And a helluva a lot of Dems voted for it like lemmings…

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They all did along with all but two Republicans. Funny how they have no problem working together on stuff like this, but when it comes to anything that helps the American people suddenly there's a ton of manufactured controversy as if we were watching a scripted pro wrestling match.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Senate:

Unanimous Support

House:

207 Republicans and 202 Democrats voted Yea

2 Republicans voted No, 0 Democrats

11 from both parties abstained

WTF happened to resisting Trump's fascist agenda? This is blatant controlled opposition

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Trump himself told the whole nation in his address that he plans to abuse it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Call it what it is: a censorship law. Apparently the climate of fear that makes people self-censor wasn’t enough.

Watch for a LOT of ‘extreme left’ opinions get taken down and their authors imprisoned.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago

It won't stop with journalists and authors. They'll be looking in Facebook posts, Reddit comments, Twitter threads, Instagram, etc. And random citizens are going to start disappearing.
They'll want people to know it can happen to anyone, not just the most visible or high profile critics.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

And darlen AOC so called progressive voted for this shit.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Politicians are still too afraid of optics, they don't want to be on record as voting against taking down revenge porn. Too many of these bills are written with a good-sounding premise but the details are where they get you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 months ago

Another step closer to achieving his Nazi wet dream.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (2 children)

While this is bullshit, we should be able to weaponize it right back at them - any lies the administration spews (which let’s face it, that’s everything) needs to be reported relentlessly.

Make them feel it!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Reported to who? The people telling the lies?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The article mentioned requiring a reporting mechanism which must be resolved within 48 hours. Because of the impracticality of the timeframe it went on to assume that anything reported would just be removed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah that will only be true for the rich and powerful. Ever go to the police as a poor for stalking?

The same way that Facebook can say "no" when you ask them to stop training AI on your data they will just send it to an automated not that will find no issue and deny the takedown but for those that pay I'm sure it will be very effective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The democrats pushed this through for the same reason they've pushed other bills to censor the internet, using piracy or CSAM as excuses. They aren't really trying to protect anyone, they want and need control over the population as much as the republicans do, so that they can maintain the cash flow from corporations that own them. So many people still look at the democrats as an opposition party to the fascists, but that isn't true at all. They work together because they're two sides of the same party. The only thing they're truly concerned with protecting is their own money and power.

Both the democrats and republicans are profoundly evil.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Republicans pass legislation through the two houses of Congress they entirely control, a Republican president signs it.

You: "The Democrats pushed this through."

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (9 children)

It passed 409-2 and the 2 no votes were Republican.

Senate was unanimous.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/119-2025/h104

Two republicans voted no. Every Dem who voted, voted yes.

We may not be able to say they stopped it, but I think it's reasonable to want them to try to.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Your comment sounds pretty fucking stupid considering every single democrats who voted, voted yes. Now get that boot out of your mouth, you're embarrassing yourself.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago

This reminds me of the DNC super donor Ed Buck who would lure in gay black men and kill them by injecting meth into them while raping them.

He managed to do it for years and wasn't until one of the victims survived to be able talk about it that he was sentenced as with every previous body it was said it was a private issue and a sad loss of a friend.
Photos managed to get shared of his racist, rape, death den helping sway the public.

Ed Buck would have loved this bill and its ability to actively scrub his image further.
If it feels like monsters would like something I don't want it.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (8 children)

rumor has it that AOC voted for this

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not a rumor, only 2 house members voted against (both republican).

mfw we can pass a bipartisan spy law no problem but a bipartisan daylight savings law is still too hard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She did. She ‘objected to some of the wording’ but jumped in line like a good little puppet.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Her and Bernie won't acknowledge palestinian defenders in their rallies. Puppets to the bone like all the others, just another form of controlled opposition.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They all did, it was 409 vs 2, with 22 not voting:

https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll104.xml

And ironically the only two Nays came from Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

censorship is bipartisan, they just want to censor different things

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

Anyone else hear thunderous applause?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Why the fuck did all the democrats vote Yes for this

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Fascism is an integration of government and corporations. Democrats are officially just the other side of the coin after this. 100% one party in the country. The longer any politician fights under the banner of Republican or Democrat the longer they want this system to continue.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

I'm so done with them. Primary all of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

“Flood the zone” benefits both parties when it comes to power grab shit like this. This barely made headlines until it was already passed and it’s too late.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

Good news, now we can report all those christians online that won't shut the fuck up!!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Wait, US Congress still exists? Certainly wouldn't know it based on how the nation has been governed for the past 4 months.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

They exist for the important work of censoring critics.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

American decline is happening at a much faster pace than I anticipated.

If you don't own a gun, now is the time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN

I am confused. The title say congress passed the bill while the article says the house is the one that passed it (so congress should be next).

Which is it?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago

Congress is the combination of the House of Representatives and the Senate. America has a bicameral legislature. (Congress=House of Reps + Senate)

Because this passed the Senate in Feb and the House recently it is correct to say that this bill has passed Congress.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The bill has passed both the Senate and House so now the president just has to sign it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Oligarchs gonna oligarch.

load more comments
view more: next ›