this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
278 points (100.0% liked)

Android

18750 readers
66 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] janNatan@lemmy.ml 120 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Before you get excited, it's an IndieGoGo project.

[–] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The one and only time I bought into a project on Indiegogo was for a phone that said it was shipping that month, even though the company had been delaying it for a year already (unbeknownst to me) and they had no idea when they were going to finish. It was straight up fraud, Indiegogo let the company do it without consequence, and 2.5 years later the project is still up on Indiegogo. Now I’m out $800, and the asshole company is still claiming they’ll send all the backers their phones any day now. They’ve been literally saying it for years.

Don’t learn the hard way like I had to. Never back an Indiegogo project.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't indiegogo just like Kickstarter? There's never a guarantee you'll ever get the thing you back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] casmael@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Aww shucks I was actually a bit interested

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is there something in particular about Indiegogo that I missed, or are you just pointing out it's crowd funded? (and that means you could lose your money without anything in return)

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

Probably the chances of them never delivering being more than 0

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kickstarter is infamous for being full of marketing tech bros who take your money and deliver nothing.

Indegogo is Kickstarter without any of the consumer protections. It's not a matter of if you'll get scammed, but by how much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

So it goes well with my Cicret bracelet

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm not disinterested, though $350 is a little steep ($450 if you're not an 'early bird'). Ideally it would be bootloader unlockable and rootable as well. I would probably use it like a PDA of old.

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-minimal-phone-first-e-ink-qwerty-phone#/

Preliminary Specs:

  • CPU: MTK 6769
  • RAM: 4GB
  • Storage: 128GB
  • OS: Android 13
  • Display: 3.5” E-Ink Touch / 300 PPI / High Refresh Rate
  • Front Camera: 8MP
  • Rear Camera: 16MP
  • WIFI: 802.11 a / b / g / n 2.4GHz / 5GHz WiFi Direct,WiFi,B 4.1
  • ATοΌ†T: YES
  • T-Mobile: YES
  • Verizon: YES
  • Battery: 4000mAh QC 18W Wireless charge less than 20W
  • Features: QWERTY keyboard, NFC, GPS, A-GPS, Fingerprint (side), Face unlock, G sensor, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Light sensor
[–] Kyoyeou@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I looked into E-ink displays this summer and the tech is just so high priced

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't e ink in the highest tier of patents stifling advancement?

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah, licensing fees are super high. Who knows what kind of battery life and displays we might have on our personal devices today if eink wasn't so encumbered.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

They can't claim carrier compatibility yet before they even source the parts. (They're in Japan right now sourcing Chinese parts, allegedly, and only have renders thus far.) Let alone until they have a working prototype to test against fyi.

Carriers may very well not certify the device due to compatibility issues. Or they won't be able to afford the certification process.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Man, what I really want is a e-ink smart watch....

[–] enix@reddthat.com 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wonder how hard it would be to open source something similar with something like an nrf52 or similar and a 3d printed enclosure I might have to look into this tbh

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Idk if Bangle.js is open source, but I imagine a e-ink display could be possible?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] directive0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wish Eric had given us pebble v2 instead of beeper, honestly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The Garmin Instinct watches have an e-ink like display. I get about 25 days of battery on mine.

https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/775421

[–] Szybet@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

SQFMI Watchy exists... And has a chinese supplier now which doesn't suck

The community is also active, recently a few from ground up firmwares have appeared

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I have a Fossil Hybrid, it's perfect

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 3 points 1 year ago

I have an old Sony eink one which still works and is perfect

[–] machinaeZER0@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Depending on what features you want/need, you can get a used Pebble on eBay and run Rebble on it. More hoops to jump through if you use an iPhone, but android support is pretty straightforward!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

$350

Low price

I could go get a new Motorola from Walmart for $69 right now.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The 69 dollar phone is a subsidized pre paid device. They plan on taking a loss on the sale and making it up with cell plans.

Also this is a niche device for a VERY niche audience. It will never be cheap cheap, just cheap for what it is.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fun fact that's actually how I got my top-of-the-line phone for free. I went in for a new phone&plan and we negotiated a good plan that worked for me, one that came included with a phone. When it came time to close the deal they go into the back and get me a phone. It's a crappy hand-me-down, so naturally I ask if they have any other options. There were two more options each one took them longer to come back from and each one being pretty much the same thing. I ask if they have anything better and they go back and grab an Iphone which I declined because I don't fuck with apple. They take the phone, very quickly put it away, then walk right up to the rack, picked one of their best phones and handed it to me. I smiled and accepted.

Because they're salespeople paid on commission, I was able to game the system to effectively rob the store of an expensive product and the most fucked up thing about that whole situation is that everyone involved still made more money off of me in the long term than if I walked. We really need nationalized communications utilities because the whole thing is just so ridiculous.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Yerbouti@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

325$, how is that low-priced? I've never paid more then 200$ for a phone, I have an s20+ now.

[–] devilish666@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

For that price i can get second hand phone with higher specs & colorful screen

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah... It is low priced if you look at Apple or Samsung higher end or recent models.... otherwise yes it is expensive.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do these phones always miss the mark?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm just annoyed that they sell uncomplicated phones, but they are always hundreds of dollars. Just put an eink screen on a cheap SOC price around $40.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$40 is way too low. Economics of scale do not apply for such a niche product. $140-180 should be doable.

[–] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

The problem is that e-ink is a patented technology and the patent owner charges insanely high royalties for using it in your product.

load more comments (1 replies)

Making a product made to discourage usage is always going to fail. Palm phone had everyone excited because we wanted a good small phone. Instead they made an intentionally bad small phone and wondered why no one wanted it.

[–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Man, I hope that takes off. Would be great to charge your phone every week or two.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is anyone using one of the Hisense e-ink phones? How are they?

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 12 points 1 year ago

My partner has an Onyx Boox Palma, which is similar in some ways. It's fast and would be usable as a basic smartphone if it could take a SIM card. Despite the display being one of the best it is ultimately still e-ink and has many downsides if you are trying to use it like you would a normal smartphone. The ideal target market for this kind of device is really people that have already cut down their screen time and can comfortably live without most things, but still want the option to install any application if necessary.

If you want a more conventional smartphone experience, the TCL NXTPAPER devices may be a better alternative, though they obviously have their own downsides as they do not have true e-ink displays.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

If it came with a good terminal app I would be very tempted. I loved my blackberry and the old slide androids.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the point of a phone with worse display and worse specs, and that costs more than my Β£250 Motorola G73?

[–] Duallight@lemmy.today 19 points 1 year ago

It's not a "worse" display. It's a different display. The only point is that if you want an e-ink phone (either for readability or battery life) this is one of the only options. Assuming it actually launches at least.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 7 points 1 year ago

I'd get this if it has other messaging apps like Signal, and banking apps...seems like it has android so should be ok. Unfortunately I don't see it hitting the market realistically...

I have an e-ink notebook. The low refresh rate is intolerable for doing anything like menus or text input.

I like the idea of a minimal phone but I think e-ink is a deal breaker for me, and I suspect most others.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

I wish I could get a tablet that is like the ReMarkable tablet with more storage (at least 64GB, storage is dirt cheap these days) or a MicroSD slot. I'm not paying $400 for a tablet with 8GB of storage in 2024. For comparison, you could buy 8TB of SSD storage for that price.

This is interesting but not quite what I want.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

How long does the battery last? I think a week minimum and preferably a month it's what would be needed to make it worth it.

load more comments