this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
172 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68723 readers
3577 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 99 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Remember when the US lectured the world on opening markets and free trade?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 months ago

that was just to abuse our markets

[–] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

But not China!!!!

(Except for the copious amount of drop shipping we do, component parts, manufacturing, and many other aspects of the global economy we engage with them on and will continue to do unabated once the political theatre is out of the way because people want to believe in a boogeyman that’s making eggs more expensive)

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago

One of the main supporters for this was the UAW. Real rich people don't care about this, if this hadn't passed they wouldve just sold there shares in American auto companies and invested in Chinese companies, or moved manufacturing to China for higher subsidies, lower labor costs and even bigger profits, or use that as a threat to lower wages here. Under globalism capital is free to move to wherever there is the most profit.

This isn't a rich vs poor situation, it's a worker vs consumer situation.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Whoa unexpected call for violence.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is it a call for violence? Or is it just a stating how things are...

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

Doesn't seem violent to me. Climate change threatens us all, and from where I sit, the ultra-wealthy aren't afraid and think they can simply buy/exploit their way out of the looming danger.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It fucking sucks and will slow down the transition to electric cars.

We already have that shit in France too. The national companies sell prohibitively expensive cars with some amount of financial help. But if you buy a Chinese car (even with a demonstrably proven carbon footprint) you don't get any help.

Basically this is about protecting our car industry and shielding from their incapacity to provide a value electric car to the masses. Nothing to do with emissions.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

China subsidizes their infrastructure and industries which is why they are able to produce cheaper than domestic.

There really isn’t a good answer in these kind of trade wars other than outright banning, tariffs, or heavy subsidies to your own industry.

In these cases countries are determining national security concerns outweigh environmental concerns. Not saying it’s right or wrong but that’s where we are

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ideally we can use this strategy to our benefit, tell the North American automakers that there needs to be x readily available models of electric cars with minimum specs at a certain price by a specific date or they will open up the market to China who will eat their lunch.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That is genius, not seeing any downsides.

[–] Wade@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Heavy subsidies to our own industry are definitely a better alternative, but our politicians would rather cry "China bad" and further line the pockets of our ruling class

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

We could take like some of or all of the 20B we spend on oil subsidies and subsidize electric instead... that seems like a good answer to me.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You couldn't pay me to drive a French car. Stick to making wine and baguettes.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Don't worry, they generally don't drive for long until they break anyway ...

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Huh. No mention of rules to prevent the Chinese from buying these data on the secondary market. Weird.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I keep saying that it’s just a fantasy that everyone and big tech in particular isn’t quietly selling stuff to the Chinese, especially our data since it’s so easy. Why would they be beholden to national interests when they only exist to make money?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry I'm sure the billions of dollars we just gave GM to make an EV will actually result in GM making an EV and totally not pocketing free tax payer money for the nth time.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 17 points 2 months ago

What a surprise, lawmakers in the USA cut their noses to spite their faces .. again.

I wonder what it would take for this to stop happening.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lame, I would totally have bought one.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That’s the point. This is nothing more than protectionism so you continue to buy western made cars. Now you don’t even have a choice.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's...overstepping a bit here. They aren't banning all foreign cars. They're banning cars from a state enemy that aims to enrich said enemy. They aren't banning Hyundai, Honda, Kia...etc. China has been straight up bragging about destroying the US economy and car industry with the BYD slave labor built cars. It would be stupid if they didn't do something about that.

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When China has the only affordable EVs currently and the US government prevents Americans from buying them, then that means the US government made a decision to slow the global adoption of EVs.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't have the only affordable EVs, they have the CHEAPEST. There's a big difference.

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I know it's hard to imagine what it's like, but when somebody is poor then "cheapest" = "only"

I can afford chinese EVs that go for 10-12k

I can't afford a 35-60k tesla, or would buy one on principal.

That's why this slows the world's transition to EVs.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Our oligarchs want us to compete to the death for their ever dwindling relative to inflation and productivity scraps, but they've grown too powerful to tolerate competition themselves.

Not when they've gone to all the trouble of normalizing monopolies and duopolies at home.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 10 points 2 months ago

tHe MaRkEt WiLl ReGuLaTe ItSeLf!

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

On one hand this will slow the ev transition.

On the other car manufacturing is one of the few industries left in America with some union density and decent wages and having to compete with subsidized Chinese evs that are made with a fraction of the labor costs would destroy that industry.

Globalism hurts workers and helps consumers. One of the triumphs of neoliberalism is to get people to identify as consumers first and workers second.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Protectionism has historically not done well for any country that's implemented it. If we wanted to improve American industry, then we should be focusing our efforts and dollars on improving local industry to compete.

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

Full protectionism does cause problems with inflation and degrading the competitiveness of firms, but full neoliberal globalism leads to a race to the bottom on wages and working conditions.

The answer is somewhere in the middle, we shouldn't be putting blanket tariffs on a country or the entire world. But we also shouldn't turn away from possibly helpful protectionist policies.

Tarriffs can help in new and developing industries to make sure they aren't strangled in the crib by foreign competition. A large reason for the success of the development of south Korean and Taiwanese economies was due to initial protectionist policies . The tariffs have to be understood to be temporary though but they can help in getting an industry off the ground.

I'd argue electric vehicles are an emerging industry that will be very important if the world shifts to a greener economy. Letting China take over that market and dominate it would be detrimental to the strength of our economy long term.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I would be curious to poll the Seattle WTO protesters and see how they voted in the last election.

I recently moved to the Midwest from the West Coast and understand how Globalist policy kinda sucks for a lot of people out here.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

waitll you find out that a lifelong globalist just won the election

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does that mean also no musk-mobiles in China?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Most Tesla sold outside USA are made in China.
I recently saw a review of a Tesla here in Denmark (EU so Chinese made), where the reviewer exclaimed, hey the quality has become really good, it's not like the old shit they used to make.

And I must admit I laughed a little, thinking that's probably because they are made in China now.
Cars like Xpeng have a reputation of being among the most well built cars you can get! So made in China does not necessarily equal poor quality anymore.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The bad rep that China gets for making shit is mass produced knock off shit.

A company can have manufacturing in China with good quality control and come out OK.

One example to take this with a grain of salt. I got a Omega Mastocating juicer (it crushes instead of shreds). They usually manufacture in the USA. Came out with a cheaper model built in China. Guess what? The locking ring started snapping on loads of them. The part is under loads of pressure so it needs to be build to spec. The Chinese factory was trying to save money by remelting the leftover plastic into the parts. Weakening the part.

Omega issued a recall. Set a policy to stop cutting that corner. Basically fixed the issue.

I mean. It's on a manager to save money so he was doing his job. Same shit would happen in the states. Still adds to the bad rep. Omega stepped up and made the right move to fix it. Rep really comes down to the company.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 months ago

China is incredibly good at manufacturing.

They will manufacture whatever you want. A lot of people want to make the cheapest shit possible. There exists manufacturers in China who will oblige.

They can also make very very good quality things, but you'll need to pay accordingly.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Model Y has been made in Germany since 2022 according to this

List of Tesla factories - Wikipedia - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Tesla_factories

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

According to that, it's only batteries and Manufacturing equipment. I'm pretty sure model 3 and Y for EU is made in China.
Sort by country to get a very quick view of what is made in Germany.

[–] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 months ago

Great taxpayer money going to luxury cars for rich people. The party of the rich and upper middle class.