this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
173 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22131 readers
3703 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 82 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We're still pretending he's not gonna skip them with a declaration of war in Canada, Panama, or Greenland?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Elections are run by the states including for federal office. They are not run by the federal government

Nor are there is no provision anywhere to cancel elections due to war. They still happened during the US Civil war

Hell even if in a hypothetical that it was just blue states that held elections, that would be enough to potentially flip the house. California and New York have enough potential and realistic house flips to change the US from red to blue

Declaring that they won't happen just plays into Trump's hands. It makes people more cynical and less inclined to fight back

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago

You speak sensibly.

Trump is without sense and will act without sense.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Good thing the majority of state Governors are not Republican and would not welcome interventions from a fascist federal government. Oh wait...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

even if in a hypothetical that it was just blue states that held elections, that would be enough to potentially flip the house. California and New York have enough potential and realistic house flips to change the US from red to blue

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

OK. That's a wild thing to say. If you're willing to say that the red states may illegally fail to hold elections can you not recognize the likelyhood that they'd stop, by force, blue states from doing the same?

Do you seriously think blue states wouldn't fold if pressured to stop elections?

I'm not convinced that any of this will come to pass and elections will be stopped but if they want to they can and will.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That requires much more than just red states republican legislatures being complicit. That's just a straight up military coup at that point. That's not the scenario the earlier people were laying out

We've had hybrid senarios before. During Lincoln's elections, many southern states didn't even let him put his name on the ballot. He still won the election

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Not really if it's threatened and the dems instantly fold. A dozen or so congress members and few senate members in support of freezing elections, the threat of violence, and a continuation of what see we now. That's about all that's needed.

Still, though it'd argue it unlikely, military intervention cannot be ruled out

On this being a separate situation it's not really. It's just an expansion of your own hypothetical. In a world where red states halt elections they would also pressure blue states to do the same. Blue states would likely fold as they have to many of the more important issues recently.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Don't conflate national dems and state dem parties. The state dems are fighting back far stronger

Hell many are defying trump straight to his face such as Maine's governor who told him in person that they'd not comply with his anti-trans stuff

Kathy Hochul is still enforcing NYC's congestion pricing despite Trump directly telling her to stop and threatning federal funding

And so on

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Why do you think flipping the house matters? We're living in a dictatorship.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Because they do have power if they're willing to use it. It can slow them down. For instance,

They have subpoenas. Make republicans have to spend all their time talking about all the horrible things they're doing to the floor. Remove all their time to do said horrible things because they're too busy testifying

If they don't testify, they can put people in contempt of congress which can be enforced by the Sergeant at Arms. This is something that did happen to Steve Bannon when he refuesed to testify for the Jan 6th committee. Not just a hypothetical power

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Because they do have power if they’re willing to use it. It can slow them down. For instance,

Chuck Schumer had that power last week. Look how well that turned out. That's what you're basing your hopes on?

They have subpoenas. Make republicans have to spend all their time talking about all the horrible things they’re doing to the floor. Remove all their time to do said horrible things because they’re too busy testifying

Actually, no. Democrats have no subpoena power or ability to hold official hearings while in the minority.

If they don’t testify, they can put people in contempt of congress which can be enforced by the Sergeant at Arms. This is something that did happen to Steve Bannon when he refuesed to testify for the Jan 6th committee. Not just a hypothetical power

I wouldn't exactly use Steve Bannon as a prime example. It took years for him to see any consequence at all, and he got a bare minimum. He got, what, 4 months? For the amount of money Bannon is making off of riding Trump's dick, I'd sit in a jail cell for 4 months too.

And I'll counter your argument with Jim Jordan. Ignored subpoenas. Didn't even get so much as a censure in the house for ignoring their own subpoena, let alone any form of punishment at all. If you for half a second think a Republican-led House is going to charge a prominent, full-throated MAGA member and chair of the Judiciary Committee with contempt, order his arrest, and have him jailed for non-compliance, I have beachfront property on Mars you may be interested in.

Your rationale goes on the premise that traditional norms and laws still apply. They do not. When the people who are in charge of enforcing those laws and norms are actively telling you that they're not going to enforce them, those laws aren't worth the paper they're printed on.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Who enforces those subpoenas? Who enforces the contempt charges? Trump is in charge of all of the enforcement mechanisms.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If they don't testify, they can put people in contempt of congress which can be enforced by the Sergeant at Arms.

The Sergeant at Arms as I wrote. They are part of congress. They are not part of the executive branch


Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment, imprisonment for coercion, or release from the contempt citation).[18]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress

The sergeant at arms of the United States House of Representatives is an officer of the House with law enforcement, protocol, and administrative responsibilities. The sergeant at arms is elected at the beginning of each Congress by the membership of the House.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergeant_at_Arms_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So, one guy is going to go around arresting top officials of a dictatorship?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Trump is often a paper tiger. He quite often backs down from fights the minute someone pushes back. He's also been rather willing to throw people under the bus

He's not yet a dictator as much as he might be trying to make himself one. Most of his power in this moment is from people complying assuming he is. He is a lot weaker in actually getting you to do something if you resist than he wants you to believe. Don't do his dirty work for him

The fight isn't over until it's over

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

You do realize this dream scenario, should it spring into reality, only puts Schummer in charge again?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Elections are run by the states including for federal office. They are not run by the federal government

This sounds like someone who doesn't live in a red state...

I'm waiting for Missouri to just go ahead and decide that we don't need to vote. They've just overturned votes we passed.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 days ago (4 children)

There'll be a war before the midterms, martial law will be declared and elections will be suspended. That's what I suspect he'll do.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yea, I’m no doomer. But, I read a lot of history. Trump getting inaugurated and Elon throwing a seig heil twice solidified my belief that there will be no 2028 presidential election.

Trump will manufacture a “Reichstag Fire” moment which will be used to blame “antifa”, “leftists”, “trans”, “immigrants”, etc. and then martial law will be implemented. However, this will only come after Trump feels satisfied that the military has been purged of any high ranking officials that may dissent.

Once martial law is enforced, they will continue to purge anti-Trump dissenters and any marginalized groups.

Trump could very well pull all of this off by 2026 midterms let alone 3 years from now before the next presidential election.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

He is old and getting older. Hopefully he doesn't make it to 2026, naturally or not.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There’s still JD Vance. Trump will be the scapegoat for all of the dirty work that was done to usher in a fascist regime. Vance will be presented as the calmer and more focused dictator.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't know that Vance has that stupid charisma Trump has that his base fucking gargles on. I also don't think others would be as scared to act against him as they are the current dictator. This is probably just wishful thinking on top of wishful thinking though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

orangeboi is categorically heinous, but this has gone far, far beyond being about one person. This is The Business Plot, round two. This is an axial shift of the United States away from democracy going forward. This is fascism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

The shitty ones always live long unfortunately

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Did you see that article about the “Trump derangement syndrome” bill written by the Minnesota state politician who has a side gig as a child predator?

They’re gonna ignore that last bit and make it a doubleplus ungood thoughtcrime to openly object in any way, shape, or form to the fascists taking over. The bill makes provisions for non-consensually institutionalizing political opponents. That is not an exaggeration. That bill is a test that they’re running in Minnesota to see if they can pass and implement this sort of thing.

This bill will be used as a pattern. Expect this to show up in Texas and Florida at some point soon. After that, expect it then to make its debut on the national stage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't even have to be an actual war - this government showed that they can redefine words to mean whatever they want (see them invoking a wartime law recently), so they might as well define drag queens as an invasive species, declare war on them and implement martial law/suspend elections because who's gonna stop them?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Exactly, war isn’t necessary, all he needs us a large protest. He'll send in goons to instigate violence, then send in authorities to break it up. After some nasty violence, probably some deaths, he will have the justification to impose martial law. Then he can suspend elections until peace is restored, and since he controls the peace, that will never happen.

He needs to keep his congressional majorities, to give him credibility and to keep investigative commitees under Republican control. He will never allow free elections unless he is confident that MuskRat's/ Russia's/ China's hackers have the election system fully rigged.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

What makes you think the midterms will be free and fair elections?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

I'm more amused that they think the country will survive long enough to get to midterms.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Because they're run by the states, and blue states are still capable of having those. Red states, though? Nah, the won't be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Still living in ignorance. There will be no real elections any more, as they have told multiple times

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry. There will be no midterms due to (random excuse). Signed: Emporer Donald Trump

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

More likely there will be rigged elections, to give the pretense of legitimacy. Just like in Russia.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are we still pretending we’ll have anymore real elections?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

we had real elections before?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

but Trump promised to get rid of elections

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Elon Musk will just manipulate the outcome of the elections, just like he did in 2024. It no longer matters who you vote for; it matters only who Elon Musk sponsors.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not if the spineless Democrats have anything to say about it!

I mean given how the Democrats passed their temporary budget that will give away billions to the wealthy and cuts social security and Medicare/aid with the Republicans help, it's really the Democrats fault the economy tanks.

You know how that's going to be played it in the media and the Republicans and Democratic leadership will be too incompetent to ineffectively push back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Midterms, Might cost Republicans... Might???? I should hope I the upcoming midterms fucking decimate the the idiots....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Idk why anyone thinks 2026 isn't already for all intents and purposes over. Watch even this year, Virginia is going to go deep red, free and fair elections in the United States are done. You want republicans out of Congress, you work to get 20 million or so Americans on the national mall. Anything else at this point is just performative nonsense.

Like bro already said all blue states would disappear next year in a "big surprise."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We've had multiple special elections already this year. Dems have had some massive overperformances in some of them.

For instance, Iowa saw a Trump+21 district state senate distict flip

Virginia had special elections earlier in January where dems had a couple of point overperformance compared to harris

Stop doing Musk's and Trump's work for him and claim things are over before they're over. All this does is create cynicism and apathy that play straight into his power

Join on the streets too and vote in every damn election. They want you doing neither, so do both

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

cost Republicans in the 2026 midterms.

So back to the people that helped create the environment we are in?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Guys, the economy slaughters children in Gaza might be a bit sends US citizens to death camps unstable rn raids private institutions with police compliance idk if I should strips citizens of all rights vote for these guys ignores all court orders stating their actions are illegal rn

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

The elections? It should cost some of them their lives.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Eh. Just give American hamster brains a few years and we'll be back to voting for rapist felon traitor fascists because the TV told us to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

All we have to do to get the house back is stop robbing state parties via the "victory fund" so it can be used in down ballot races.

The last three elections they've been giving the max state donations to the DNC and chosen presidential candidate, putting all our eggs in the same neoliberal baskets for a position the last Dem president spent four years telling us didn't even matter and was effectively powerless.

I really expected the new DNC chair to come out against the program, there's still plenty of time, but I wanted a day 1 announcement

load more comments
view more: next ›